|
The award
of the International Mineral Processing Congress to countries takes
place according to a strict set of guidelines which are set out
in the Constitution and which are shown again below (IMPC
HOST SELECTION PROCEDURES). Countries wishing to bid to
host a Congress should peruse these guidelines and if they wish
are most welcome to contact the Chairman of the Council for further
information (cyril.oconnor@uct.ac.za). It is important to note that proposals to host an IMPC
will only be accepted from recognised national professional organisations
or learned societies in the relevant region which are properly and
legally constituted.
|
|
The current status of awards (as at the
end of XXIII IMPC in Istanbul) is: |
|
|
2008 |
Beijing (XXIV) |
|
2010 |
Brisbane (XXV) |
|
2012 |
New Delhi (XXVI) |
At
the time of the Beijing Congress bids will be considered for hosting
the XXVII IMPC to take place in 2015. Given the continental locations of recent IMPCs
a bid from the Americas would be warmly welcomed! |
IMPC HOST SELECTION PROCEDURES |
-
|
Recognising
that many countries may wish to host the IMPC, Council has adopted
the following procedures to facilitate the identification and choice
of Host Countries. |
| - |
Council
undertakes to ensure fairness and transparency in all its dealings
with prospective hosts |
Call
for Proposals |
| |
The Call for Proposals is made by Council and is to go out at least
seven years in advance of each Congress. |
| |
Regions |
| |
For
selection purposes, the world is divided into the following Regions:
|
| |
1. |
the Americas
|
| |
2. |
Africa,
the Middle East and India |
| |
3. |
Asia
including China, Japan and Australasia |
| |
4. |
Europe
and the former USSR |
| |
-
Each Region will in turn present Proposals
to Council and is therefore guaranteed a Congress every twelve
years provided always that suitable Proposals are received.
-
Where a country which has never previously
hosted a Congress wishes to present a Proposal, this can be
made independently of their Region.
-
If no suitable Proposal is received from a Region,
Council may call for Proposals from the next Region in the rotation.
|
| |
|
| |
- |
Proposals
will only be accepted from recognised national professional organisations
or learned societies in the relevant region which are properly and
legally constituted. |
| |
- |
All Proposals
are to be received by the Chairman by the date he indicates in his
Call for Proposals. Proposals may be made in person, by teleconference
or any other medium. |
| |
- |
Competing
organisations in the same Region are encouraged to collaborate and
co-operate in the preparation of Proposals. Proposals are made entirely
at the cost of the applicants. |
| |
- |
Proposers
are strictly prohibited from offering any Council member gifts or
other inducements. |
| |
|
| |
Council must be completely satisfied that Proposers are able to
fully meet the following essential selection criteria; |
| |
- |
The ability
to protect the health and safety of attendees |
| |
- |
The ability
to finance and underwrite the cost of the Congress |
| |
- |
To have
the organisational and management skills and resources in running
a large, international congress. |
| |
Council
will also require detailed information on the following criteria:
|
| |
-
Local transport infrastructure
-
Availability of suitable Congress facilities
and accommodation
-
Likely cost of Delegate registration
-
Likely support from industry and government
-
Ability to arrange suitable partners program
-
Suggested President
-
Availability of local industry tours
-
Cultural and religious considerations
-
Any other matters which the applicant considers
relevant
-
Matters as added by Council from time to time
|
| |
|
| |
- |
Council
will meet, either in person or telephonically, to review and discuss
all Proposals. Proposers will be invited to make personal &/or
video presentations and Council must be available to consider all
Proposals equally. |
| |
- |
Council
must be fully satisfied that the Proposals have met and will continue
to meet all three of the essential selection criteria. If there
is any doubt, the Proposal may be rejected. Council may require
tangible evidence to be produced to support claims. |
| |
- |
Council
will consider all material and information presented to them in
a fair and objective manner. Council members are strictly prohibited
from receiving any form of gift or inducement from Proposer organisations
|
| |
|
| |
- |
Council
will meet and thoroughly discuss all Proposals. Council members
will then rank their order of preference from the most preferred
to the least preferred Proposals. |
| |
- |
Members
will submit their selections to the Chairman who will amalgamate
the results and advise of the top three Proposals. |
| |
- |
Council
members will then rank the final three Proposals in order of preference
from the most preferred to the least preferred. |
| |
- |
The Proposals
receiving the most first preferences will be the successful Proposal
to be the Host Country. |
| |
- |
In the
event of an equal number of first preferences, the Chairman will
count the number of second preferences for the tied Proposals and
the Proposal receiving the most second preferences will be the successful
Proposal to be the Host Country. |
| |
- |
In the
event of the second preference counting resulting in a further tie,
and the Chairman having no conflict of interest, the Chairman shall
have the deciding vote and shall choose only between the tied Proposals.
The Chairman’s casting vote will be final. |
| |
- |
If the
Chairman has a conflict of interest, he shall withdraw and the Vice-Chairman
shall have the casting vote. |
| |
- |
Council
shall keep a record of their deliberations and the Chairman must
be able to advise unsuccessful Proposers of the reasons for their
lack of success. |
|